Repeat Drink-Driving Offence
- Eric Chen

- Aug 11
- 1 min read
Updated: Sep 5
Background
Mr E faced his eighth charge for excess breath alcohol, representing a significant pattern of repeat offending. His criminal history demonstrated escalating consequences, with his most recent conviction resulting in a 10-month imprisonment sentence, highlighting the serious nature of his ongoing behaviour and the court's previous attempts at deterrence.
The Challenge
The case presented several complex factors that required careful legal strategy:
Extensive criminal history: Eight drink-driving charges indicated persistent offending behaviour
Previous custodial sentence: The 10-month imprisonment from his last conviction suggested the court's willingness to impose significant penalties
Last-minute complications: Mr E lost his approved home detention address just one week before his scheduled sentencing hearing, creating an urgent procedural challenge
Legal Response
Faced with these challenging circumstances, our legal team took immediate action:
Rapid response to changed circumstances: When Mr E's home detention address became unavailable, we quickly prepared and filed updated submissions to address this development
Comprehensive oral advocacy: At the sentencing hearing, we presented detailed oral submissions that likely addressed mitigating factors, rehabilitation prospects, and alternative sentencing options
Strategic positioning: Despite the serious nature of repeat offending, we successfully advocated for a non-custodial outcome
Outcome
The court sentenced Mr E to:
200 hours of community work: Providing meaningful contribution to the community while avoiding incarceration
18 months of intensive supervision: Ensuring ongoing monitoring and support to address underlying issues
Significance
This result demonstrates effective advocacy in challenging circumstances, achieving a community-based sentence despite serious repeat offending and last-minute complications. The outcome balances accountability with rehabilitation opportunities, avoiding the social and economic costs of imprisonment while maintaining public safety through intensive supervision.


